Rapid and label

Scientific Reports volume 12, Article number: 21413 (2022) Cite this article

833 Accesses

4 Citations

Metrics details

In this work, we demonstrate the development of a rapid and label-free electrochemical biosensor to detect Listeria monocytogenes using a novel stimulus–response thiomer nanobrush material. Nanobrushes were developed via one-step simultaneous co-deposition of nanoplatinum (Pt) and alginate thiomers (ALG-thiomer). ALG-thiomer/Pt nanobrush platform significantly increased the average electroactive surface area of electrodes by 7 folds and maintained the actuation properties (pH-stimulated osmotic swelling) of the alginate. Dielectric behavior during brush actuation was characterized with positively, neutral, and negatively charged redox probes above and below the isoelectric point of alginate, indicating ALG-thiomer surface charge plays an important role in signal acquisition. The ALG-thiomer platform was biofunctionalized with an aptamer selective for the internalin A protein on Listeria for biosensing applications. Aptamer loading was optimized and various cell capture strategies were investigated (brush extended versus collapsed). Maximum cell capture occurs when the ALG-thiomer/aptamer is in the extended conformation (pH > 3.5), followed by impedance measurement in the collapsed conformation (pH < 3.5). Low concentrations of bacteria (5 CFU mL−1) were sensed from a complex food matrix (chicken broth) and selectivity testing against other Gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus) indicate the aptamer affinity is maintained, even at these pH values. The new hybrid soft material is among the most efficient and fastest (17 min) for L. monocytogenes biosensing to date, and does not require sample pretreatment, constituting a promising new material platform for sensing small molecules or cells.

Listeria monocytogenes is a virulent foodborne bacterium ubiquitous in the environment (soil and water) that causes hundreds of deaths in the US annually1,2. Every year, nearly 48 million cases of foodborne illness are reported, nearly 19% of which are due to infection with Listeria monocytogenes, having potentially a $15 billion negative economic impact from healthcare costs, lost productivity, and loss of life3,4. With symptoms such as muscle pain, nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, and chills1, L. monocytogenes is among the deadliest of foodborne pathogens, with a fatality rate of up to 30% in high-risk individuals5,6. It is particularly dangerous for pregnant women, although they generally recover, their babies may not survive2.

Listeria monocytogenes is a difficult pathogen to monitor in food processing environments due to its ability to proliferate under low moisture content, high salinity conditions, or at temperatures associated with common refrigerator/freezer units7. A zero-tolerance rule for L. monocytogenes in ready-to-eat foods was implemented by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), and the European Union (EU)1 compounded with the increasing number of food recalls related to Listeria contamination in recent years8 further reinforces the need for real-time pathogen detection methods that can identify contaminated food products before reaching the public.

The current state-of-the-art for detecting Listeria in food processing plants, including total viable counts (TVC), ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays), and PCR (polymerase chain reaction), are susceptible to errors and false readings, and require costly laboratory settings with highly-trained personnel to complete9,10. Test results from these methods are severely delayed by requiring two consecutive enrichment steps (up to 48 h) to concentrate/amplify bacteria prior to a qualitative detection step11, because these methods lack sensitivity [~ 100 CFU mL−1 limits of detection (LOD)]12,13 and cannot directly detect low levels of pathogens in complex samples such as media, broth, or homogenized tissue.

Electrochemical sensing techniques are extensively studied for different applications due to their inherent advantages of robustness, fast response, ease of use, miniaturization, high sensitivity, low detection limits, small analyte volumes, ability to work with turbid samples, and label-free capabilities12,14. These properties are important to consider when analyzing environmental and food samples in a processing facility where user-friendly devices and simple sample preparation are required15,16. The deposition of metal nanoparticles (such as platinum) and/or polymers at the surface of electrochemical sensors is known to significantly enhance surface area and/or electrical conductivity, in addition to improving biorecognition agent immobilization, resulting in higher sensitivity, faster capture and improved detection of the target bacteria17. The role of platinum nanoparticles within the field of biosensing has been recently reviewed by Yu et al.18, who summarize their properties including high current densities, fast mass transport, and enhanced electrocatalytic properties that result in improved sensor's key performance indicators19,20,21,22.

Aptamers are single-stranded oligonucleotides and, if selected properly and applied in the correct binding buffer, show high affinity toward targets23. Aptamers bind specifically via interactions of target(s) and exposed structures24,25. Aptamers have numerous advantages over antibodies, including low synthesis cost, high reproducibility, high thermal stability, and ability to modify and/or integrate various functional groups (e.g., biotinylation, thiolation, etc.)25,26. Comprehensive reviews on aptamer-based technologies for foodborne pathogen detection summarize recent developments in optical and electrochemical biosensors (i.e., aptasensors)24,27,28, including platforms that use magnetic beads conjugated to DNA aptamers and antibody-aptamer functionalized fiber-optic sensor for detection of L. monocytogenes cells from contaminated ready-to-eat meat products29. Hills et al.30 and Oliveira et al.31 reported a sensing mechanism for L. monocytogenes detection in food samples using the actuation of distinct chitosan-aptamer nanobrushes using the aptamer discovered by Ohk et al.29. Recently, Sidhu et al.32 developed an aptasensor using platinum interdigitated microelectrodes functionalized with this same DNA aptamer for Listeria spp. detection in vegetable broth and hydroponic media by incorporating the sensor in a particle/sediment trap for on-site irrigation water analysis.

The use of stimuli-responsive polymers for actuation in sensing applications has gathered increasing attention in recent years as summarized in a recent review by Hu et al.33. Stimuli-responsive polymers undergo major changes in solubility, volume, and/or conformation in response to external stimuli, and have been used to mimic naturally occurring responsivity to external changes on the environment that is observed in living systems33,34,35. Sodium alginate is a natural non-toxic, biodegradable, and low-cost polysaccharide containing repeating mannuronic and guluronic acids. Alginate is an anionic molecule with pKa of approximately 3.5. Above the pKa, alginate is hydrophilic and in environments that are below this pH it is hydrophobic36,37. Previous works have used polymer actuation for improving bacteria capture38 and recently Hills et al.30 and Giacobassi et al.39 studied actuation of stimuli-responsive polymers for both capture and sensing of pathogens in complex media. These studies successfully demonstrated that by controlling polymer actuation at the microscale, pathogens can be captured when the polymer is extended, and signal transduction is improved after collapsing the polymer at the sensor surface30,39. However, these previous studies used metals nanoparticles and polymers in a layer-by-layer deposition to produce the sensors30,40, requiring a multi-step fabrication process. One of the biggest challenges in these previous works was tethering the nanobrush to the surface followed by biofunctionalization, which used crosslinking techniques that were non-specific, and control of surface tethering degree versus bioreceptor immobilization was challenging.

Herein, we focus on development of a one-step co-electrodeposition of alginate thiomers and nanoplatinum as an aptasensor platform. We build on this unique alginate thiomer (ALG-thiomer) platform to develop a rapid, label-free biosensor to detect L. monocytogenes. Previous studies have shown co-electrodeposition of alginate and other conductive material such as graphite and MnO2-C41,42, but to the best of our knowledge, our work is the first to show simultaneous electrodeposition of ALG-thiomers and platinum for biosensing, which opens a new and exciting area of research for nano-biosensor development. We optimized the ALG-thiomer deposition conditions under different combinations of voltage, ALG-thiomer concentration and sonoelectrodeposition cycles, achieving up to sevenfold increase in the electroactive surface area for the best condition. Our results show that the highest signal-to-noise ratio was achieved when cell capture occurred in the extended brush conformation and the sensing in the collapsed brush conformation. Finally, we demonstrate that the ALG-thiomer/Pt nanobrush biosensor can selectively detect L. monocytogenes in a food matrix in concentrations as low as 5 CFU mL−1 and in the presence of other Gram-positive cells under 17 min without the need for sample preconcentration or redox labeling techniques.

Sodium phosphate dibasic, potassium phosphate monobasic, hydroquinone (C6H4(OH)2, chloroplatinic acid (8% w/w), and hexaamineruthenium(III) chloride (Ru(NH3)6Cl3) were acquired from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, MO). Alumina slurry (0.05 µm) and polycrystalline diamond microsuspensions (3 µm and 1 µm) were purchased from Buehler (Lake Bluff, IL). Silver/silver chloride (Ag/AgCl) reference, platinum/iridium working (Pt/Ir, 1.6 mm dia.), and platinum auxiliary electrodes were acquired from BASinc (West Lafayette, IN). Lead acetate (30% w/v) was obtained from Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA). 1-Ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide HCl (EDC) and sulfosuccinimidyl 4-(N-maleimidomethyl)cyclohexane-1-carboxylate (Sulfo-SMCC) were acquired from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA). Potassium ferrocyanide trihydrate (K4Fe(CN)6·3H2O) was acquired from Ward's Science (Rochester, NY). Cysteine hydrochloride monohydrate and potassium ferricyanide (K3Fe(CN)6) were acquired from J.T. Baker (Phillipsburg, NJ). Alginic acid sodium salt (low viscosity), N-Hydroxysuccinimide (NHS), platinum wire (99.95% Pt, 1.5 mm dia.), 5,5′-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (Ellman's reagent), and 2-(morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid) (MES) buffer were obtained from Alfa Aesar (Ward Hill, MA). Aptamers created by Ohk et al.29 that target L. monocytogenes membrane protein Internalin A (KD = 103 CFU/mL, 47 DNA bases, and 15,008 g/mol) were obtained from Gene Link Inc. (Hawthorne, NY). Yeast extract, tryptic soy broth (TSB), buffered peptone water (BPW), and tryptic soy agar (TSA), were obtained from Becton, Dickson and Company (Sparks, MD). Shelf-stable vegetable broth (UHT, ultra-high temperature processed) was acquired from a local grocery store. Dialysis tubing (DiaEasy™, 3.5 kDa MWCO) was obtained from Biovision (Milpitas, CA). Potassium chloride (KCl) and sodium chloride (NaCl) were purchased from EMD Millipore Corporation (Burlington, MA). Potassium nitrate (KNO3) was acquired from British Drug Houses (ON, Canada). Tris-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (TE) buffer (pH 7.4) was obtained from Quality Biological (Gaithersburg, MD). Tryptose phosphate broth (TPB) was obtained from HiMedia (Mumbai, India).

Bacteria cultures, Listeria monocytogenes (ATCC 15313) and Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923), were acquired from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA) and used as target and interferent bacteria for sensitivity and selectivity tests, respectively. Biosafety level 2 standards set by the National Institute of Health were used to conduct experiments with pathogenic microorganisms S. aureus and L. monocytogenes. All bacteria culture initially stored at − 80 °C were transferred to growth media, TPB for L. monocytogenes and TSB for S. aureus, by identical and sequential duplicate transfers and incubated under aerobic conditions for 24 h at 35 °C. S. aureus and L. monocytogenes cultures were maintained at 4 °C for up to 3 months on tryptic soy agar (TSA) and TSA with 0.6% (w/v) yeast extract (TSAYE) slants, respectively. Slant transfers to growth media were carried out to prepare bacteria cultures for analysis. Bacteria samples were enumerated by first serially diluting samples in BPW and plating on TSA and TSAYE for S. aureus and L. monocytogenes, respectively; after 48 h at 35 °C; results were recorded as CFU mL−1.

Sodium alginate was modified to incorporate a thiol group termination by amide bond formation between carboxylic acid groups of sodium alginate and primary amino groups of cysteine using carbodiimide mediated coupling as in Jindal et al.43. In this method, the carboxyl groups of the alginate are activated with EDC at pH 6 for 45 min. Then, cysteine hydrochloride monohydrate was added in a weight ratio of 2:1 (alginate:cysteine) and allowed to react for 2 h at pH 4 followed by another 1 h at pH 6 (see Fig. 1 for fabrication steps). The reaction was performed under continuous stirring at room temperature.

Schematic of the steps for fabrication, biofunctionalization, and sensing of the ALG-thiomer/Pt brushes functionalized with aptamer selective to L. monocytogenes. First, ALG-thiomers are formed based on the reaction of sodium alginate with cysteine using N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N′-ethylcarbodiimide (EDC) chemistry. Then, ALG-thiomer and platinum are sonoelectrodeposited simultaneously onto the working electrode, resulting in ALG-thiomer/Pt brushes that are shown via SEM imaging. Next, the ALG-thiomer/Pt brushes were functionalized with aptamer via carbodiimide crosslinking chemistry. Sensing strategy consisted of ALG-thiomer/Pt brush actuation from collapsed to extended states based on pH changes: bacteria capture was performed at pH 7 with brushes in the extended state followed by measurement (sensing) when brushes are collapsed at pH 3.

Next, the solution was dialyzed (molecular weight cut-off 3.5 kDa) to isolate the alginate-cysteine conjugate (ALG-thiomer). The dialysis included two days against 1 mM HCl (pH 4), followed by 1 day in 1 mM HCl and 1% (w/v) NaCl, and another two days in 1 mM HCl (all the solutions were exchanged twice a day). Subsequently, the suspension was freeze-dried (− 50 °C, − 0.120 mBar, 48 h) in a Labconco FreeZone 6 unit (Labconco, Kansas City, MO, USA). ALG-thiomers were subsequently stored under nitrogen atmosphere at 5 °C until use for sensor modification.

The degree of modification achieved on the alginate was determined by quantifying the amount of thiol groups through Ellman's analysis according to instruction from Thermo Fisher Scientific44. Briefly, the samples and 5,5′-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid), namely Ellman's reagent, were mixed in phosphate buffer containing EDTA (ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid) at pH 8 and their absorbance was measured at 412 nm against a blank control using a spectrophotometer (Genesys 10S, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA). A standard curve was prepared using cysteine hydrochloride monohydrate to quantify the thiol concentration (expressed as μmol of thiol groups g−1).

Alginate and platinum were simultaneously deposited (Fig. 1) on the surface of platinum/iridium working electrodes (previously polished according to manufacturer instructions) using the sonoelectrodeposition method developed by Taguchi et al.19. In this method, a power supply connected a platinum wire (anode) and the working electrode (cathode) applied a fixed potential for 1 s followed by 1 s of sonication to the deposition solution, as alternating cycles. The deposition solution contained 0.72% (w/v) chloroplatinic acid, 0.001% (w/v) lead acetate, and ALG-thiomer at different concentrations (0.05, 0.075 and 0.1% w/v). Voltages of 1.5, 5.75 and 10 V for 60, 100 and 140 sonoelectrodeposition cycles were also evaluated to determine the optimal deposition conditions.

Field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to analyze the morphology from the best brush deposition condition based on the electrochemical experiments. After coating the electrode modified with ALG-thiomer/Pt brushes was with a 5-nm thick layer of platinum [Cressington sputter coater 208 HR (Watford, United Kingdom)], SEM images were taken by a FEI Quanta 600 FEG (Hillsboro, OR). Magnification of 10,000 and 16,000 times with accelerating voltage of 10 kV were used for the surface imaging.

The surface chemistry of the electrodes coated using the selected optimized brush deposition was analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), performed in an Omicron ESCA + (Scienta Omicron, Sweden) with CN10 electron gun and Mg/Al dual X-ray gun.

Each step of the biosensor preparation (alginate-platinum deposition, aptamer loading and bacteria detection) was electrochemically characterized using a 3-electrodes cell system (working, Ag/AgCl reference and platinum auxiliary electrodes) at room temperature using cyclic voltammetry (CV) and/or electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) methods described by Burrs et al.17 using a CHI 600E potentiostat/impedance analyzer. CV test was performed in a 4 mM Fe(CN)63− in 1 mM KNO3 solution with scan rates of 50, 100, 150, and 200 mV/s, 650 mV switching potential and 10 s quiet time. CV was used to obtain the electroactive surface area (ESA in cm2) of the electrodes via Randles–Sevcik theory using the slope of the current versus the square root of scan rate (ip versus v1/2), as previously reported19,45 (see supporting information for details). The ESA values were used to determine the best deposition parameters (ALG-thiomer concentration, voltage and number of sonoelectrodeposition cycles, as described in ALG-Thiomer/Platinum nanobrsuh deposition), as well as to characterize brush actuation, and to determine aptamer loading concentration (see supporting information for details).

For the actuation tests, a negatively charged probe (KFeCN63−), a neutral probe (C6H4(OH)2), and a positively charged probe Ru(NH3)63+ were used. The pH of the redox probe solution was adjusted to pH 7 or pH 3 using a 1 M HCl or NaOH solution. The pH of the redox solution was monitored during the CV tests to ensure reported pH did not change by more than 0.5 pH units. Actuation tests were also carried out in the presence of a constant background Listeria concentration of 103 CFU mL−1 in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) using EIS to determine the most efficient capture and measurement strategy between extended and collapsed conformation of the brushes.

EIS was used to determine the limit of detection (LOD), range of detection, and sensitivity of the biosensor when exposed to bacteria at concentrations varying from 101 to 106 CFU mL−1 (standard curve). For functionalization procedure of ALG-thiomer/Pt brushes with aptamers, see supporting information for the details. The analysis was performed with initial DC potential of 0 V, AC amplitude of 100 mV and a frequency range of 1–100,000 Hz. Sensitivity testing was initially performed in PBS and then again in commercially sterile vegetable broth. From the Bode plots (impedance vs. frequency), the impedance value at fixed cutoff frequency was used to build the calibration curves, consisting of the impedance (Ohm) vs. the concentration of cells (log CFU mL−1). From the calibration curves (R2 > 0.97), the sensitivity to the target bacterium was obtained using the slope of the linear portion and then the 3σ method was used to calculate the limit of detection (LOD)39. Change in impedance (\(\mathrm{\Delta Z}= {Z}_{bacteria}-{Z}_{no \, bacteria}\)) was used to illustrate the electrodes performance independent of media. Selectivity to L. monocytogenes was evaluated by determining sensitivity and LOD in the presence of the identical concentration of another Gram-positive bacteria (S. aureus) in PBS and in sterile vegetable broth.

Results of independent experiments were performed at least in triplicate and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. SPSS Software was used to conduct the statistical analysis. ANOVA (one-way analysis of variance) was used to test for significance and expressed at the p < 0.05 level. Significantly different means were separated by the Tukey test.

The ALG-thiomer reaction efficiency was first evaluated by Ellman's analysis. The result obtained was 1050 ± 200 μmol of thiol groups g−1 of polymer, about 3 times higher than the thiol content of 324.54 μmol g−1 presented by Jindal et al.43 with a similar procedure. In our approach, EDC (a carbodiimide compound) reacts with carboxylic acid groups of the alginate to form an active O-acylisourea intermediate that is replaced by the primary amino groups of the cysteine, forming an amide bond with the original carboxyl group (see Fig. 1). N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) can be included in the reaction to improve efficiency as the EDC couples NHS to carboxyls forming a NHS ester that is considerably more stable than the O-acylisourea intermediate46. Marcano and Sabino47 reported a higher value of 1939 μmol g−1 of thiol groups by including NHS on the activation reaction with EDC. However, this approach introduces additional functional groups which can cross link, reducing the ability to control brush actuation and introducing experimental error.

The presence of the thiol group in the Ellman's analysis indicates that sulfur is present in the sample but does not provide information about the state of the sulfur (reactive sulfhydryl group or oxidized) as the thiol group is very susceptible to oxidation upon exposure to atmospheric oxygen with possible disulfide-like bond or cross-link (–S–S–) formation47.

XPS analysis was performed to characterize the chemical bonds for the best deposition condition related to electrochemical response (see supporting information for detailed results and discussion). XPS spectrum of the ALG-thiomer/Pt brush deposition (Fig. 2a) shows the effective deposition of both ALG-thiomer and Pt components, with characteristic peaks of C 1s, O 1s, N 1s and S 2p from ALG-thiomer and Pt 4f from platinum. The N 1s peak at 399 eV fall within the range for cysteine-metal complexes48. The binding energy of 400 eV can be associated with the presence of amine group40 or with the cysteine49. Similarly, Wang et al.50 and Li et al.51 presented small S 2p and N 1s peaks on the same range as in the present work, indicating the presence of these components on carbon dots (trisodium citrate-cysteine complexes by comparing its XPS full spectrum with pure cysteine) and alkanethiol self-assembled monolayer on metallic Pt, respectively. The S 2p binding energy of 164 eV (Fig. 2b) is characteristic of thiol52 or its coordination to the metal ions48. The peak at 162.5 eV (S 2p) is also within the range expected for metal-sulfur bonds52. Yang and Agrios53 associated a doublet in the S 2p region of a Pt modified 4-mercaptobenzoic acid at slightly lower values (161.84 eV and 163.04 eV) than the obtained in the present work (162.5 eV and 164 eV) to the formation of a Pt–S bond. Castner et al.54 also reported the binding energy of 161.9 eV as consistent with the sulfur atoms bound to the gold surface as a thiolate species. The S 2p peak in the neighborhood of 168.5 eV might be due to the presence of oxidized sulfur48,53. The Pt 4f spectrum (Fig. 2c) presents two peaks at 71 eV and 74.3 eV corresponding to S-bonded Pt, which is consistent with literature reports for Pt in contact with S atoms 53,55. Romanchenko et al.56 assigned the binding energy of 71.5 eV to Pt0 metallic nanoparticles and 74 eV to Pt(IV)-S compounds, which could also be the case in the present study as: (1) Pt could be depositing directly onto the electrode's surface as well as binding to ALG-thiomer before depositing, and (2) the electrodeposition using chloroplatinic acid involves Pt(IV) cations and its reduction to Pt057. Overall, the XPS spectra shown in Fig. 2 indicate bonding between the Pt nanoparticles and the S atoms in the ALG-thiomer.

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis. (a) survey spectrum, (b) S 2p spectrum, and (c) Pt 4f spectrum showing the successful co-deposition of both ALG-thiomer and Pt onto electrodes. Solid lines with smooth curves are from XPS Peak software used to identify the S 2p and Pt 4f peaks.

The morphology of the nanoplatinum and alginate brushes for the best deposition condition related to electrochemical response (see details in supporting information results and discussion) is shown in Fig. 3. The ALG-thiomer/Pt brush deposition formed juxtaposed spheroids (brush terminal nodes) with diameters ranging from 80 to 400 nm with a uniform coating with some random cauliflower shape structures distributed throughout the surface. Similar, although smoother, structure was presented by Chen et al.42 when simultaneously electrodepositing alginate and MnO2-C composite. Also, similar spheroid structure although more porous and tridimensional was shown by Giacobassi et al.39 with the deposition of PNIPAAm brushes over reduced graphene oxide and platinum layers. Similarly to PNIPAAm brushes described by Giacobassi et al.39, the electrodeposition of ALG-thiomer/Pt brushes led to homogeneous brush formation with uniform shaft and node sizes distribution. According to Taguchi et al.19, the pulsed sonoelectrodeposition method promotes increased mass transfer to the electrode surface, which results in uniform material deposition. The relatively large and smooth structures obtained in the present work are expected since the co-deposited ALG-thiomer complex is a significantly large polymeric material, which was also observed by Giacobassi et al.39. The spheroids shape increases the surface area resulting in significant increase in electrochemical surface area relative to the bare electrode (see results and discussion in supporting information). Additionally, the brush configuration in combination with brush actuation is expected to result in increased exposure of the aptamers to the medium and subsequent bacteria binding, as previously reported by Giacobassi et al.39 and Hills et al.30 (see results Sections "ALG-thiomer/Pt brush actuation and Listeria spp. capture" and "Biosensor performance testing"). Further investigation on the effects of the different deposition parameters on the morphology should be performed considering the importance of the morphology towards sensing performance.

Scanning electron microscopy images of ALG-thiomer/Pt brush at 10 kV and (a) 10,000, and (b) 16,100 times magnification, respectively, showing a uniform brush formation and deposition over the electrode surface with terminal nodes ranging between 80 to 400 nm in diameter.

Alginate is an acidic polymer that has a pKa value between 3.2 and 4 (for guluronic and mannuronic acids, respectively)37,58. Normally, below the pKa of the alginate carboxylic acid groups are protonized in the COOH form and the polymer is collapsed. As the pH of the solution increases, the COOH becomes ionized to COO−, and the resulting electrostatic repulsion among these groups causes the polymer to extend37,59,60. To test if the pH-stimuli actuation property of alginate was affected by its modification and to characterize the electrostatic interactions during actuation at the electrode's surface, CV tests were carried out with three different redox probes and the ESA values were calculated (Fig. 4a). A negatively charged probe (KFeCN63−), a neutral probe (C6H4(OH)2), and a positively charged probe Ru(NH3)63+ were used. Moreover, CV was carried out at pH of 3 and 7, below and above the polymer's pKa, respectively (Fig. 4a), for three repetitive cycles.

(a) Electrostatic interactions during three actuation cycles between pH 3 and pH 7 of the ALG-thiomer/Pt brushes with different redox probes: a positively charged probe (Ru(NH3)63+, a negatively charged probe (KFeCN63−), and a neutral probe (C6H4(OH)2). (b) Average total impedance for the ALG-thiomer/Pt brush functionalized with 400 nM aptamer and exposed to 103 CFU mL−1 of Listeria monocytogenes at different cutoff frequencies for various capture/measure strategies based on actuation. "EX" refers to extended state (pH 7), "COL" refers to the collapsed brush state (pH 3), "cap" refers to cell capture and "meas" refers to measurement. Error bars denote the standard deviation of the arithmetic mean of at least three replicates; different letters represent significantly different means (p < 0.05).

As shown in Fig. 4a, above the pKa (pH 7), electron transport decreases with the KFeCN63− probe due to charge repulsion/steric hindrance as the alginate carboxylate group is negatively charged; with the neutral probe (C6H4(OH)2) the electron transfer is less affected but still some swelling may happen due to intramolecular electrostatic repulsion among the carboxylate groups (COO−) of the alginate59; and with the Ru(NH3)63+ probe, peak current and ESA increase due to electrostatic interactions. The opposite occurs below the pKa (pH 3), the electron transfer is favored with the negative probe increasing the peak current and ESA, while the peak current and ESA reduce with the positive probe. Similar behavior of ESA increasing or reducing due to electrostatic interactions or repulsion, respectively, have also been observed by Oliveira et al.31 and Hills et al.30 for chitosan actuation with the same redox probes. With repetitive actuation, peak current and ESA changed slightly (Fig. 4a) between repetitions; however, the percent change was not significant with no observable hysteresis, which indicates that ALG-thiomer/Pt brush actuation is reversible and can be repeated multiple times (at least 3 times) from collapsed to extended states. These results are an improvement from Hills et al.30 and Giacobassi et al.39 brush actuation of chitosan and PNIPAAm, respectively, that reported actuation hysteresis between repetitions.

The ALG-thiomer/Pt brush was converted into an aptasensor by functionalizing with 400 nM of amino terminated aptamer via carbodiimide cross-linking, as shown in Fig. 1 (see supporting information for details). Based on the principle that binding of target bacteria to the aptamer decreases the electron transfer at the electrode's surface, which is measured as an increase of impedance, actuation tests were carried out with EIS to determine the optimum pH values for capturing and sensing L. monocytogenes. For these experiments, a constant L. monocytogenes concentration of 103 CFU mL−1 in PBS was used. In Fig. 4b, the extended brush conformation at pH > 3.5 is noted as (EX), the collapsed brush conformation at pH < 3.5 is noted as (COL), the cell capture state is noted by (cap) and the electrochemical measurement step is noted by (meas). Cell capturing in the extended conformation (pH 7) and sensing at collapsed state (pH 3) provided the highest impedance values (p < 0.05) for all cutoff frequencies and, therefore, sensing efficiency (see also Bode plots in Fig. S3 in the supporting information). The optimum capture of targeted bacteria at the extended form can be related to a higher contact area with the tested solution and an increased probability of aptamer-cell interaction, compared to pH 3 at which the brushes are contracted, and the receptor binding site(s) may be inaccessible. Similar to our previous work on this capture strategy, it is likely that the cells become entangled in the polymer matrix during the sensing step, where aptamer-target binding may no longer be the mechanism for cell capture but rather entanglement during nanobrush collapse. The specificity for this detection platform is rooted in the initial affinity between aptamer and target at pH 7 (extended ALG-thiomer nanobrush), where the collapse at pH 3 likely causes secondary structure changes in the aptamer but also entraps cells in the polymer matrix.

This finding on the capture strategy is consistent with the results reported by Hills et al.30 and Giacobassi et al.39 that also presented higher sensing efficiency using the EX/cap → COL/meas strategy for pathogen detection. Additionally, the modification on the alginate with cysteine followed by the aptamer attachment, using its carbonyl groups, seems to neutralize the negative charges of alginate that would normally cause electrostatic repulsion to the highly negatively charged (under most conditions) membrane of L. monocytogenes61. This bacteria capture method is fairly simple compared to others reported in the literature such as the method by Malic et al.62 that developed a high gradient magnetic separation device tailored to immunomagnetic nanoparticles based on a 3D magnetic trap integrated into on a polymeric microfluidic device for magnetic capture and release of L. monocytogenes.

The dielectric properties of biological tissues are characterized by three dispersions including: (a) α-dispersion occurring at low frequency, associated with tissue interfaces, such as membranes; (b) β-dispersion at radiofrequency, caused by the polarization of cellular membranes, proteins and other organic macromolecules; and (c) γ-dispersion at microwave frequency, associated with the polarization of water molecules. Cell membranes act as insulating barriers at low frequencies demonstrating resistive pathways, while demonstrating high capacitance at higher frequencies. Consequently, the EIS actuation data were used to determine the cutoff frequency (CF). This analysis was conducted in a frequency range from 1 to 50 Hz, which corresponds to the alpha frequency dispersion region of biological tissues. The maximum impedance signal (p < 0.05) was observed at CF of 1 Hz (Fig. 4b) and was selected to determine key performance indicators (KPI) for the aptasensor in complex media and mixtures of bacteria in the next section.

The ability of the electrodes deposited with ALG-thiomer/Pt brushes functionalized with 400 nM of amino terminated aptamer to detect L. monocytogenes was evaluated by EIS. See supporting information for details on the biosensor functionalization and results on optimum aptamer loading concentration onto ALG-thiomer/Pt brushes (Fig. S2). In the field of biosensors, EIS is particularly convenient to the detection of binding events on the transducer surface without the need of labels (such as fluorescence dyes, enzymes, redox or radioactive compounds)63. The impedimetric term arises because the interface offers (upon the occupation of the receptive centers) an electric impediment for charges to be transferred that increases as a function of target binding to the interface, which allows the label-free biosensing64. Impedance differences caused by the presence of bacteria (ranging from 100 to 103 CFU mL−1) were obtained using the EX/cap → COL/meas strategy (pH 7 → 3). The total test time was 17 min, which included 15 min for bacteria capture and 2 min for the EIS measurement. Bode plots are shown over a frequency range of 1 Hz to 100 kHz; insets are a zoomed in view of the lower frequency range (1–5 Hz). Based on the cutoff frequency (CF) analysis presented in Fig. 4b, all calibration curves were developed using data from Bode plots for a CF of 1 Hz.

Figure 5 shows ALG-thiomer/Pt/aptamer nanohybrid electrode calibrated for L. monocytogenes (y = 39.21x + 631.64, R2 = 0.99) and in the presence of S. aureus (y = 69.34x + 719.16, R2 = 0.98). The selectivity test was performed with Staphylococcus aureus due to its similarity to Listeria as Gram-positive bacteria and to both being known foodborne pathogens in addition to have similar sizes (0.5–2 µm). The addition of an equal concentration of S. aureus in the testing solution did not show significant interference (p > 0.05) on the LOD (4.5 ± 0.8 CFU mL−1 with L. monocytogenes alone and 5.7 ± 2.1 CFU mL−1 with both bacteria) indicating no cross-reaction between the sensor and S. aureus. The sensitivity increased (p < 0.05) from 39.21 ± 2.61 Ω/log(CFU mL−1) with L. monocytogenes alone to 69.34 ± 2.79 Ω/log (CFU mL−1) when S. aureus was also present. The linear range also changed from 101 to 106 CFU mL−1 with only L. monocytogenes in PBS to 101–105 CFU mL−1 in the bacteria mixture. Ohk et al.29 presented a LOD of 103 CFU mL−1 using the same aptamer in a fiber-optic biosensor to detect Listeria spp. Recently, Oliveira et al.31 using the same aptamer presented similar LODs compared to the current study for L. monocytogenes alone in PBS and in the presence of S. aureus, 2.5 and 2.6 CFU mL−1, respectively; using actuation of chitosan/platinum brushes. While antibody sensors are reported to be prone to give false-positive reactions with S. aureus, which is also a protein A carrier, the aptamer used in the present work was proven to be selective to L. monocytogenes29. This aptamer targets the surface protein Internalin A which is one of the major invasion proteins involved in pathogenesis29. Despite the fact that this protein is structurally analogous to certain cell-wall proteins with internal repeats identified in members of the genera Staphylococcus and Streptococcus65, the present results corroborate that this aptamer can be selective to L. monocytogenes.

Representative Bode plots over the frequency range of 1–100,000 Hz (insets are a zoomed in view of the lower frequency range from 1 to 5 Hz) for the ALG-thiomer/Pt brush sensor functionalized with 400 nM aptamer exposed to (a) L. monocytogenes in PBS and (b) L. monocytogenes + S. aureus in PBS. (c) Calibration curves (total impedance change at 1 Hz vs. log bacteria concentration). Error bars represent the standard deviation of the arithmetic mean of at least three replicates.

After confirming the ALG-thiomer/Pt brush sensor ability to detect bacteria in PBS, the sensors were tested in a food product to determine its selectivity to the target bacteria as well as if the sensitivity may be affected by the interference of food components. Chicken broth (Fig. 6, y = 42.59x + 1320.93, R2 = 0.98) was used as it contains carbohydrates and proteins, among other components, that could interact with the biosensor through non-specific adsorption resulting in a false-positive signal. The sensitivity toward L. monocytogenes in chicken broth was 42.59 ± 2.35 Ω/log(CFU mL−1) with LOD of 4.4 ± 0.8 CFU mL−1, both similar (p > 0.05) to the results in PBS. These results also indicate that the aptamer is able to selectively bind to L. monocytogenes even in complex food matrices. Using the same aptamer, Hills et al.30 reported a slightly higher LOD of 9.1 CFU mL−1 in vegetable broth with a layer by layer reduced graphene oxide/nanoplatinum/chitosan brush electrode that actuated based on chitosan's pH-response.

(a) Representative Bode plot over the frequency range of 1–100,000 Hz (insets are a zoomed in view of the lower frequency range from 1 to 5 Hz) and (b) calibration curve (total impedance change at 1 Hz vs. log bacteria concentration) for the ALG-thiomer/Pt brush sensor functionalized with 400 nM aptamer exposed to L. monocytogenes in chicken broth. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the arithmetic mean of at least three replicates.

The binding effectiveness of the aptamer and its role on the biosensor performance was further evaluated by exposing the ALG-thiomer/Pt brush sensor absent of aptamers to increasing concentrations of L. monocytogenes in PBS (see supporting information, Fig. S4). The LOD obtained was 28.88 ± 1.31 CFU mL−1 with sensitivity of 23.27 ± 7.87 Ω/log(CFU mL−1), respectively. The performances of the sensor with aptamer previously presented were significantly (p < 0.05) better when compared to the one without aptamer. Despite of some randomly trapping of bacteria onto the nanobrushes, these LOD and sensitivity results demonstrate the aptamer's role of selectively binding to L. monocytogenes, and significantly enhancing the performance of the sensor. In addition, these results further demonstrate the actuation protocol effectiveness to capture bacteria applying the ALG-thiomer/Pt brushes, which could be used as an initial step for food safety monitoring (i.e., total bacteria count).

Alginate is becoming more popular for biosensors applications due to its biocompatibility and functional groups useful for encapsulation and immobilization of biorecognition agents such for the detection of antibiotics, tumor cells, blood analysis, among others66,67. Some used encapsulated bacteria to monitor water toxicity68,69, but still, fewer reports involve bacteria detection. For instance, Kikuchi et al.70, used alginate to encapsulate a colorant that is cleaved by b-galactosidase enzyme from E. coli for its detection in breast milk, reporting a LOD of 102 CFU mL−1 after 2 to 8 h incubation.

A compilation of current biosensors for the detection of L. monocytogenes in different food samples or buffers is presented in Table S1 (see supporting information). Liu et al.71 presented good results detecting L. monocytogenes in a range of 68 to 68 × 106 CFU mL-1 by using aptamer-functionalized magnetic nanoparticles (as pre-concentration probes) and aptamer-functionalized upconversion nanoparticles (fluorescent signal probes) together; however, the procedure includes a 1 h incubation plus a pre-concentration step. Sidhu et al.72 proposed a platinum interdigitated array microelectrodes functionalized with the same aptamer used in the present work and reported a LOD of 5.39 CFU mL−1 of Listeria spp. in PBS also with 17 min detection. In another work, Sidhu et al.32 applied the same platinum interdigitated array microelectrodes functionalized with aptamers for rapid on-site flow through detection of Listeria spp. in irrigation water using a smartphone-based potentiostat and in flow conditions and the reported LOD was 48 CFU mL−1. Our sensor offers some advantages over most found in the literature, including simpler and faster fabrication with no need for cleanroom fabrication; no labeling nor bacteria pre-concentration required; and short detection time, being among the most efficient platform for L. monocytogenes sensing to date, with low limit of detection and wide linear sensing range relevant to food safety.

Detection of a specific pathogen in any real food sample is time-consuming and laborious, as there are background signals due to impurities in the sample, either from the complex multicomponent structures or the presence of other microorganisms (pathogenic and nonpathogenic) that requires pre-enrichment treatments and laboratory settings. This study reports on a sensitive, selective and simple to fabricate impedimetric aptasensors using a one-step fabrication process of alginate thiomer/platinum nanobrushes. For the first time, we show that ALG-thiomer modified with nanoplatinum and aptamers maintain stimuli-responsive properties of the alginate while also maintaining the affinity for target bacteria, L. monocytogenes, due to aptamer binding. Actuation of the ALG-thiomer/Pt brushes significantly improved bacteria detection due to matrix entrapment in the collapsed state. The linear sensing range between 10 and 106 CFU mL−1 and limit of detection of 5 CFU mL−1 in a food sample cover the relevant levels for food safety analysis, enabling food manufacturers to reduce economic and public health implications from recalls of contaminated food. Comparing to other methods available in the literature, this sensor is among the most efficient capture mechanisms for L. monocytogenes, in addition to other advantages such as simple one-step fabrication, and no labeling, no pre-incubation nor concentration required and a response time of 17 min. The results presented in this study demonstrate that the developed sensor platform is suitable for its use in food safety monitoring applications. Furthermore, this ALG-thiomer platform can be further tested for detection of other foodborne pathogens or small molecules sensing, considerably advancing detection of targets in complex matrices.

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding authors.

Somerset, V. S. Environmental Biosensors (InTech, 2011).

Book Google Scholar

FDA. US Food and Drug Administration: Bad Bug Book, Foodborne Pathogenic Microorganisms and Natural Toxins (FDA, 2012).

Google Scholar

Hoffmann, S., Maculloch, B. & Batz, M. Economic Burden of Major Foodborne Illnesses Acquired in the United States, EIB-140 (US Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service, 2015).

Google Scholar

USFDA. The Reportable Food Registry: A Five Year Overview of Targeting Inspection Resources and Identifying Patterns of Adulteration (United Stated Food and Drug Agency, 2016).

Google Scholar

Ramaswamy, V. et al. Listeria: Review of Epidemiology and Pathogenesis. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 40, 4–13 (2007).

CAS Google Scholar

Frye, D. M. et al. An outbreak of febrile gastroenteritis associated with delicatessen meat contaminated with listeria monocytogenes. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 90005, 943–949 (2002).

Google Scholar

De Noordhout, C. M. et al. The global burden of listeriosis: A systematic review and meta- analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 14, 1073–1082 (2014).

Article Google Scholar

FDA. US Food and Drug Administration: Recalls, Market Withdrawals, & Safety Alerts. (2021). https://www.fda.gov/safety/recalls-market-withdrawals-safety-alerts. Accessed 10th Feb 2021.

Lavecchia, T., Tibuzzi, A. & Giardi, M. T. Biosensors for Functional Food Safety and Analysis. in Bio-Farms for Nutraceuticals: Functional Food and Safety Control by Biosensors, 267–281 (2010).

Velusamy, V., Arshak, K., Korostynska, O., Oliwa, K. & Adley, C. An overview of foodborne pathogen detection: In the perspective of biosensors. Biotechnol. Adv. 28, 232–254 (2010).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Hitchins, A., Jinneman, K. & Chen, Y. Bacteriological Analytical Manual Chapter 10: Detection of Listeria monocytogenes in Foods and Environmental Samples, and Enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes in Foods. (2017).

Vanegas, D. C., Claussen, J., Mclamore, E. & Gomes, C. Microbial Pathogen Detection Strategies. in Encyclopedia of Agricultural, Food, and Biological Engineering, 1–4 (CRC Press, 2017). https://doi.org/10.1081/E-EAFE2-120051868.

Vanegas, D. C., Gomes, C. & Mclamore, E. S. Biosensors for indirect monitoring of foodborne bacteria. Biosens. J. 5, 1–3 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Baraket, A. et al. A fully integrated electrochemical biosensor platform fabrication process for cytokines detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 93, 170–175 (2017).

Article CAS Google Scholar

McLamore, E. S. et al. FEAST of biosensors: Food, environmental and agricultural sensing technologies (FEAST) in North America. Biosens. Bioelectron. 178, 113011 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Mclamore, E. S. et al. SNAPS: Sensor analytics point solutions for detection and decision support systems. Sensors 19, 4935 (2019).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Burrs, S. L. et al. A comparative study of graphene–hydrogel hybrid bionanocomposites for biosensing. Analyst 140, 1466–1476 (2015).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Yu, H. et al. Recent progress of the practical applications of the platinum electrochemistry biosensors. Front. Chem. 9, 677876 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Taguchi, M. et al. PulSED: Pulsed sonoelectrodeposition of fractal nanoplatinum for enhancing amperometric biosensor performance. Analyst 141, 3367–3378 (2016).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Claussen, J. C. et al. Nanostructuring platinum nanoparticles on multilayered graphene petal nanosheets for electrochemical biosensing. Adv. Funct. Mater. 22, 3399–3405 (2012).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Zeng, R. et al. Single-atom platinum nanocatalyst-improved catalytic efficiency with enzyme-DNA supermolecular architectures. Nano Energy 74, 104931 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Hrapovic, S., Liu, Y., Male, K. B. & Luong, J. H. T. Electrochemical biosensing platforms using platinum nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes. Anal. Chem. 76, 1083–1088 (2004).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Acquah, C., Agyei, D., Monney, I., Pan, S. & Danquah, M. Aptameric sensing in food safety. In food control and biosecurity. in Handbook of Food Bioengineering (Vol. 16) (ed. Grumezescu, H. &) 259–277 (Elsevier, 2018).

Teng, J. et al. Aptamer-based technologies in foodborne pathogen detection. Front. Microbiol. 7, 1426 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Acquah, C. et al. Deploying aptameric sensing technology for rapid pandemic monitoring. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 36, 1010–1022 (2016).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Tan, S. Y. et al. SELEX modifications and bioanalytical techniques for aptamer: Target binding characterization. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 46, 521–537 (2016).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Kärkkäinen, R. M. et al. Aptamers for safety and quality assurance in the food industry: Detection of pathogens. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 46, 445–454 (2011).

Article Google Scholar

Torres-Chavolla, E. & Alocilja, E. C. Aptasensors for detection of microbial and viral pathogens. Biosens. Bioelectron. 24, 3175–3182 (2009).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Ohk, S. H., Koo, O. K., Sen, T., Yamamoto, C. M. & Bhunia, A. K. Antibody-aptamer functionalized fibre-optic biosensor for specific detection of Listeria monocytogenes from food. J. Appl. Microbiol. 109, 808–817 (2010).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Hills, K. D., Oliveira, D. A., Cavallaro, N. D., Gomes, C. L. & McLamore, E. S. Actuation of chitosan-aptamer nanobrush borders for pathogen sensing. Analyst 143, 1650–1661 (2018).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Oliveira, D. A., Althawab, S. & Mclamore, E. S. One-step fabrication of stimuli-responsive chitosan-platinum brushes for listeria monocytogenes detection. Biosensors 11, 511 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Sidhu, R. et al. planar interdigitated aptasensor for flow-through detection of Listeria spp. in hydroponic lettuce growth media. Sensors 20, 5773 (2020).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Hu, L., Zhang, Q., Li, X. & Serpe, M. J. Materials Horizons and actuation. Mater. Horizons 6, 1774–1793 (2019).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Ju, H. K., Kim, S. Y. & Lee, Y. M. pH/temperature-responsive behaviors of semi-IPN and comb-type graft hydrogels composed of alginate and poly(N-isopropylacrylamide). Polymer 42, 6851–6857 (2001).

Article CAS Google Scholar

López-León, T., Carvalho, E. L. S., Seijo, B., Ortega-Vinuesa, J. L. & Bastos-González, D. Physicochemical characterization of chitosan nanoparticles: Electrokinetic and stability behavior. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 283, 344–351 (2005).

Article ADS Google Scholar

Cheong, M. & Zhitomirsky, I. Electrodeposition of alginic acid and composite films. Colloids Surf. A. 328, 73–78 (2008).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Reddy, K. M. et al. Temperature sensitive semi-IPN microspheres from sodium alginate and N-isopropylacrylamide for controlled release of 5-fluorouracil. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 107, 2820–2829 (2007).

Article Google Scholar

Liu, A. et al. Polypyrrole actuator with a bioadhesive surface for accumulating bacteria from physiological media. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 1, 951–955 (2009).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Giacobassi, C. A. et al. Sense–analyze–respond–actuate (SARA) paradigm: Proof of concept system spanning nanoscale and macroscale actuation for detection of escherichia coli in aqueous media. Actuators 10, 2 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Wang, Z. et al. Electrodeposition of alginate/chitosan layer-by-layer composite coatings on titanium substrates. Carbohydr. Polym. 103, 38–45 (2014).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Vigués, N., Pujol-Vila, F., Marquez-Maqueda, A., Muñoz-Berbel, X. & Mas, J. Electro-addressable conductive alginate hydrogel for bacterial trapping and general toxicity determination. Anal. Chim. Acta 1036, 115–120 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Chen, X., Yan, H., Sun, W., Shi, Z. & Zhang, W. Electrodeposition of alginate: MnO2–C composite film on the carbon ionic liquid electrode for the direct electrochemistry and electrocatalysis of myoglobin. Polym. Bull. 76, 3971–3987 (2019).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Jindal, A. B., Wasnik, M. N. & Nair, H. A. Synthesis of thiolated alginate and evaluation of mucoadhesiveness, cytotoxicity and release retardant properties. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 72, 766–774 (2010).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Thermo Scientific. Ellman's Reagent (Thermo Scientific, 2011).

Google Scholar

Vanegas, D. C. et al. A comparative study of carbon-platinum hybrid nanostructure architecture for amperometric biosensing. Analyst 139, 660–667 (2014).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Thermo Scientific. Crosslinking Technical Handbook (Thermo Scientific, 2012).

Google Scholar

Marcano, Y. C. & Sabino, M. A. Chemical modification of alginate with L-cysteine to extend its use in drug delivery systems. Cell. Chem. Technol. 52, 559–567 (2018).

CAS Google Scholar

Srinivasan, V., Stiefel, E. I., Elsberry, A. & Walton, R. A. Sulfur 2p chemical shifts associated with the binding of thiol and thioether groups to transition metal ions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 101, 2611–2614 (1979).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Moulder, J. F., Stickle, W. F., Sobol, P. E. & Bomben, K. D. Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (Perkin-Elmer Corporation, 1992).

Google Scholar

Wang, D., Khan, W., Tang, Z. & Wang, Y. Applicability evaluation of bright green-emitting carbon dots in the solid state for white light-emitting diodes. Chem. An Asian J. 13, 292–298 (2018).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Li, Z., Chang, S. C. & Williams, R. S. Self-assembly of alkanethiol molecules onto platinum and platinum oxide surfaces. Langmuir 19, 6744–6749 (2003).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Thermo Scientific. XPS Sulfur. (2021). https://xpssimplified.com/elements/sulfur.php.

Yang, B. & Agrios, A. G. Attachment of Pt nanoparticles to a metal oxide surface using a thiol–carboxyl bifunctional molecule OH OH OH. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 513, 464–469 (2018).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Castner, D. G., Hinds, K. & Grainger, D. W. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy sulfur 2p study of organic thiol and disulfide binding interactions with gold surfaces. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 7463, 5083–5086 (1996).

Google Scholar

Kwon, K. et al. Enhancement of electrochemical stability and catalytic activity of Pt nanoparticles via strong metal-support interaction with sulfur-containing ordered mesoporous carbon. Catal. Today 164, 186–189 (2011).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Romanchenko, A., Likhatski, M. & Mikhlin, Y. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) study of the products formed on sulfide minerals upon the interaction with aqueous platinum(IV) chloride complexes. Catal. Today https://doi.org/10.3390/min8120578 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Yasin, H. M., Denuault, G. & Pletcher, D. Studies of the electrodeposition of platinum metal from a hexachloroplatinic acid bath. J. Electroanal. Chem. 633, 327–332 (2009).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Kim, S. J., Yoon, S. G., Lee, Y. H. & Kim, S. I. Bending behavior of hydrogels composed of poly (methacrylic acid) and alginate by electrical stimulus. Polym. Int. 53, 1456–1460 (2004).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Pasparakis, G. & Bouropoulos, N. Swelling studies and in vitro release of verapamil from calcium alginate and calcium alginate–chitosan beads. Int. J. Pharm. 323, 34–42 (2006).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Yang, J., Chen, J., Pan, D., Wan, Y. & Wang, Z. pH-sensitive interpenetrating network hydrogels based on chitosan derivatives and alginate for oral drug delivery. Carbohydr. Polym. 92, 719–725 (2013).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Briandet, R., Meylheuc, T., Maher, C. & Bellon-Fontaine, M. N. Listeria monocytogenes Scott A: Cell surface charge, hydrophobicity, and electron donor and acceptor characteristics under different environmental growth conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 5328–5333 (1999).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Malic, L. et al. Polymer-based microfluidic chip for rapid and efficient immunomagnetic capture and release of Listeria monocytogenes. Lab Chip 15, 3994 (2015).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Lisdat, F. & Schäfer, D. The use of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy for biosensing. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 391, 1555–1567 (2008).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Garrote, B. L., Santos, A. & Bueno, P. R. Perspectives on and precautions for the uses of electric spectroscopic methods in label-free biosensing applications. ACS Sens. 4, 2216–2227 (2019).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Gaillard, J., Berche, P. & Frehei, C. Entry of L. monocytogenes into cells is mediated by Internalin, a repeat protein reminiscent of surface antigens from Gram-Positive Cocci. Cell 65, 1127–1141 (1991).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Lin, Y. et al. A "signal-on" chemiluminescence biosensor for thrombin detection based on DNA functionalized magnetic sodium alginate hydrogel and metalloporphyrinic metal-organic framework nanosheets.pdf. Talanta 207, 120300 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Zhan, X., Hu, G., Wagberg, T., Zhan, S. & Xu, H. Electrochemical aptasensor for tetracycline using a screen-printed carbon electrode modified with an alginate film containing reduced graphene oxide and magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles. Microchim. Acta 183, 723–729 (2016).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Wasito, H., Fatoni, A., Hermawan, D. & Sutji, S. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety immobilized bacterial biosensor for rapid and e ff ective monitoring of acute toxicity in water. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 170, 205–209 (2019).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Jung, I., Seo, B., Lee, J., Kim, C. & Bock, M. A dip-stick type biosensor using bioluminescent bacteria encapsulated in color-coded alginate microbeads for detection of water toxicity†. Analyst 139, 4696–4701 (2014).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Kikuchi, N. et al. Alginate-based sensor for detection of Escherichia coli in human breast milk. Sustainable 1, 1–15 (2020).

Google Scholar

Liu, R. et al. Development of a fluorescence aptasensor for rapid and sensitive detection of Listeria monocytogenes in food. Food Control 122, 107808 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Sidhu, R. et al. Impedance biosensor for the rapid detection of Listeria spp. based on aptamer functionalized Pt-interdigitated microelectrodes array. SPIE 9863, 98630 (2016).

Google Scholar

Download references

We gratefully acknowledge funding support from the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, award numbers 2020-67021-31375, 2020-67017-33079, and 2018-67016-27578 awarded as a Center of Excellence. The National Science Foundation under award number CBET-1805512. Figure 1 was created using BioRender.

Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA

Daniela A. Oliveira

Agricultural Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29631, USA

Eric S. McLamore

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA

Carmen L. Gomes

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript. Conceptualization, E.S.M. and C.L.G.; methodology, D.A.O., E.S.M. and C.L.G.; validation, D.A.O., C.L.G.; formal analysis, D.A.O., E.S.M. and C.L.G.; resources, E.S.M. and C.L.G.; data curation, D.A.O., E.S.M. and C.L.G.; writing-original draft preparation, D.A.O.; writing-review and editing, D.A.O., E.S.M. and C.L.G.; visualization, D.A.O., E.S.M. and C.L.G.; supervision, E.S.M. and C.L.G.; funding acquisition, E.S.M. and C.L.G.

Correspondence to Carmen L. Gomes.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

Oliveira, D.A., McLamore, E.S. & Gomes, C.L. Rapid and label-free Listeria monocytogenes detection based on stimuli-responsive alginate-platinum thiomer nanobrushes. Sci Rep 12, 21413 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25753-7

Download citation

Received: 13 May 2022

Accepted: 05 December 2022

Published: 10 December 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25753-7

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.